Labels

Showing posts with label Information Literacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Information Literacy. Show all posts

Monday, 19 July 2021

Designing Information Literacy Programmes

 Introduction:

Information literacy is the set of integrated abilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of how information is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new knowledge and participating ethically in communities of learning [1]

The above definition of information literacy is by ACRL which works as a division of the association we call ALA.

This as well as several other definitions given by several other experts of the field define information literacy in many different ways, but the main focus is always on harvesting the needed information at the right time and utilize the same to solve the problem. [2]

But when it comes to evaluating someone in terms of his information literacy skills, some standards, or we can say that some indicators must be there which test the level of information literacy in the test individual.

To facilitate this need of evaluation The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL, 2000) an association working as a division of the American Library Association (ALA) released the ‘Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education’

 

Designing of Information Literacy Programme:

As the Information Literacy is becoming a component of the library and information sector and information literacy teaching is also becoming a standard duty of a librarian or Information professionals. Various information literacy models were proposed by various contributors of the field. To mention some of them are as follows:[3]

  •        Digital Information Fluency Model
  •        Sauce Model of Information Literacy
  •      SCONUL seven pillars of Information Literacy
  •       National Information Literacy Framework (Scotland)
  •      National Information Literacy Framework (Wales)

Etc.

 

 

When it comes to decide on key components of an Information Literacy Programme, a good example is the Guidelines for the Information Literacy Components of the University wide general education program of the University of Arizona.

The five key standards of the Information Literacy section of the University Education wide Programme are:

·   Standard 1: the ability to determine the nature, extent and sources of information needed.

·       Standard Two: The ability to access information effectively and efficiently

·       Standard Three: The ability to critically evaluate information and information sources.

·   Standard Four: The ability to use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose or complete a specific project.

·       Standard Five: The ability to understand the economic, social, legal, and ethical issues surrounding the access to and use of information.

 

So to build a better information literacy programme, one should work on these core factors as these are the ultimate goals which are to be achieved and the programmed built around these motives will the best one for sure in terms of achieving the goals it is meant for.

The designing phase of the information literacy program will have different components which will work collectively to make it happen. The major components being the: teacher; the liaison (the one who coordinates and teaches the information literacy here in particular) and the final receiver of all the things i.e. the students.

 The liaison needed to understand and adapt to the evolving needs of the faculty, students, department as well as curriculum. Few points that are of prime importance can be noted as follows:[4]

·        It is important to define the role of the liaison

·        Assessment is very much essential

·        Making connections with the students is also important

·        Maintain daily records

On the basis of these various factors and work conducted by the liaison along with all the factors involved in the design of the information literacy program, suggestions are made and a better information literacy program is built. But the process does not stop here only, as the needs of the users keeps changing with time, the needs of the time keep changes , time demands the users to be up to date hence the programs also needs to be evaluated time to time and necessary changes are to be made timely.

 

Steps according to ACRL:[5]

The following characteristics are meant to serve as a guide when considering library and institutional contexts when establishing Information Literacy programmes goals and strategies:

  1.        Mission, Goals and Objectives
  2.        Planning
  3.         Administrative and Institutional Support
  4.        Program sequencing
  5.        Pedagogy
  6.       Communication and advocacy
  7.       Assessment and Evaluation

§  Student outcome assessment

§  Program evaluation

 

Conclusion:

Information literacy is the demand of the time as if anyone want to keep the pace with the changing world, which is more or less becoming information centric day by day, he must keep himself/herself updated with the current changes in the information world. Now as the sources of the information are changing the user must also change themselves accordingly. So he must learn the skills of Information Literacy. So to fulfill the information literacy skills need of the user, the institutions or the information providers must also have to focus on information literacy designing the better information literacy programs. These programmes are developed and designed on various standards proposed by different national and international organizations which were tend to define the skills of the information literate individuals, which in turn are used as the basis of designing the information literacy programs.



[1] "Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education", American Library Association, February 9, 2015.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (Accessed July 19, 2021)

Document ID: b910a6c4-6c8a-0d44-7dbc-a5dcbd509e3f

[3] Information Literacy Group website available at https://infolit.org.uk/definitions-models/ (Accessed on July 19, 2021)

[4] Zanin‐Yost, A. (2012), "Designing information literacy: teaching, collaborating and growing", New Library World, Vol. 113 No. 9/10, pp. 448-461. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801211273920

[5] Characteristics of Programs of Information Literacy that Illustrate Best Practices: A Guideline", American Library Association, July 7, 2006.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/characteristics (Accessed July 19, 2021)

Document ID: 10e9e7e2-9b77-fb14-7926-a72553366c52

 

Saturday, 3 July 2021

INFORMATION LITERACY PROGRAMMES IN INDIA

 

Introduction:

The world is facing a state of transition day by day and it would not be incorrect to say that today’s world is getting Information Centric. People are getting techno-savvy and this has become the need of the time that each every person who wants to leave their impression on the society and mark their position, needs to be information literate. IT revolution, world wide web development, developing trend of independent learning are major factors that make it more crucial for one to develop his/her information literacy skills as these skills awaken the user and not only makes him/her a better user of the information but also develops information creation habits in the user.

According to ACRL, Information literacy is the set of integrated abilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of how information is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new knowledge and participating ethically in communities of learning[1]

This as well as several other definitions given by several other experts of the field define information literacy in many different ways, but the main focus is always on harvesting the needed information at the right time and utilize the same to solve the problem. [2]

Information Literacy Programmes:

Information literacy is an important skill to survive in the information age we are in today as in today’s age everything is connected or is being connected to the information. Today information is power, information is money and information is everything. And Information Literacy is the key to the right information at the right time in the right format. So to make people information literate, as much as possible, the government of India has initiated several information literacy programmes which provide opportunity and resources at various levels of the learning and wherever it is needed, to the user for becoming information literate.

Despite the central government initiatives, various other organizations such as NGOs, state governments, associations, Standardization authorities, national institutions/organizations, etc. also work in the field of providing better opportunities for the information seekers to transform them form information illiterate to information literate.

 

National Information Literacy programmes in India:

Various information literacy programmes and initiatives that got some recognition are as follows:

1.     Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA)

In 2001, the government of India launched its flagship program with an aim to achieve Universalization of Elementary Education (UEE) in a time-bound manner, as mandated by the 86th amendment of the Indian constitution-making free and compulsory Education to the children of 6 to 14 years of age, a fundamental right. Existing schools with inadequate teacher strength are provided with additional teachers, training programs for existing teachers are also provided under the mission. Infrastructure development provisions are also made for classrooms, toilets, drinking water etc.[3]

 

2.     National Literacy Mission (NLM)

National Literacy Mission (1998) was constituted with an aim to achieve 75 percent literacy by the year 2007 by providing opportunities of functional literacy to the age group of 15 to 35 years. Campaigns such as Total Literacy Campaign (TLC) started under the NLM generated a demand for the primary education in various communities.[4]

 

3.     Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya Scheme

Government of India in August 2004 launched this scheme to ensure access and quality education to the girls of disadvantaged groups of society by setting up residential schools at upper primary level. The women belonging to SC/ST/OBC and those belonging to BPL category were given priority under this scheme.[5]

 

4.     Janshala Programme

Five UN agencies namely UNDP, UNICEF, UNESCO, ILO, and UNFPA made a collaborative effort with the government of India for the Janshala programme (1998-2004). The main aim of the programme was to make primary education easily accessible and more effective for the children, with the main focus on girls and those children who belong to the deprived communities.[6]

 

5.     Mahila Samakhya

Particularly focusing on women from socially and economically marginalized groups, this programme was started in 1989 for the education and empowerment of women in rural areas.

 

6.     National e-Governance Plan (NeGP)

National e-Governance plan was started and being implemented in various areas with a vision to make all government services accessible to the common man in his locality, through common service delivery outlets and ensure efficiency, transparency & reliability of such services at affordable costs to realize the basic needs of the common man. NeGP comprises of 27 Mission Mode Projects (MMPs) to be implemented at the central, State and Local Government levels and 8 Common Core and Support Infrastructure. Saaransh provides a bird’s eye view on various mission mode projects which was published in January 2011 which is available at https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Compendium_FINAL_Version_220211(1).pdf [7]

 

7.     Rashtriya Computer Literacy Drive

Started on 1st march 2001 by Sunita Skills Pvt. Ltd., with an objective of bringing computer education to the grass root level. It is a nationwide program to contribute to OPERATION KNOWLEDGE of government of India. It has been started in states namely West Bengal, Jharkhand, Bihar, Orissa, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram, Nagaland.[8]

 

8.     National Digital Library (NDL)

Due to the changing information needs by the users and also demand for the information particularly in digital format, a national level digital library need was felt as these also help to bridge the gap of time and space between the user and the information source. National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). The Library was launched in pilot form in May 2016. The Library was dedicated to the nation on June 19, 2018.[9]

 

9.     Public Information Kiosks (PIKs)

It is an action research project of NIRD i.e. National Institute of Rural Development working as an information cum communication center, with an objective of building awareness about rural development programmes, database development on the resources of the local area, Information and community services, empowering citizens with information.

 

10.    Village Knowledge Centres (VKC)

The MSSRF i.e. M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation in 1998 started the Village Knowledge Centres project in rural areas of Tamil Nadu as well as the UT of Pondicherry, to provide adequate telecommunication infrastructure for proper dissemination of appropriate information regarding the farming practices, education, health, weather, jobs, loan related news or schemes, governmental schemes etc. the main focus was on to reduce the digital divide as much as possible. The ultimate aim was to develop a rural knowledge repository to connect approximately 638,000 villages in India.[10]

 

11.     Swift Jyoti

Working under the umbrella of NIIT SWIFT programmes, SWIFT Jyoti mainly focus on the development of the computer literacy among the target audience that is users from age 6 to 60 years old. It is 18 hours program that covers some basic skills related to the computer literacy namely word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, graphics and pictures, online chatting, internet browsing, instant messaging, and E-mail.[11]

 

12.    Gyandoot

The working area primarily being in the poverty-stricken, tribal dominated rural areas of Madhya Pradesh, the goal of the project is to establish community-owned, sustainable and technologically innovative information kiosks. It maintains the financial profiles of the citizens and offers services such as the BPL list. It provides online education with a user interface in the local Hindi language.[12]

 

13.    e-Choupla

It is the world’s largest rural digital infrastructure, empowering 4 million farmers across 10 states. It is an initiative of ITC’s agri-business initiative where farmers can access up to date local as well as global information related to the areas of their importance like weather conditions, latest farming practices, real-time market prices etc. This web portal is available in various regional languages too. Major categories in which the work is being done are as follows:

·        Providing farmers with easy access to real-time, relevant information.

·        Raising agri competencies through knowledge and technology transfer.

·        Bringing appropriate farm and non-farm services close to farmer’s doorstep.

·        Expanding choice and services for evolving rural customers[13]

 

14.    Friends Model

FRIENDS stands for Fast Reliable Instant Efficient Network for Disbursement of Services. These are the Jan Sewa Kendras designed as a single-window facility where citizens can make government related transactions with ease and comfort and without delay. The facility became operational inn 14 districts of Kerala. Token management system is adopted to eliminate queues and special help desks are also provided to guide the public who are not well conversant with the payment procedures.[14]

 

15.  The Akshaya Project

Kerala is the first State in India to take initiative for the mass transformation of ICT by the implementation of district wide e-literacy project ‘AKSHAYA’ in 2002, in Malappuram district of Kerala, with an intention of ‘Empowering Kerala’. The venture paved the way for the migration of Kerala to the first e-literate state. By bringing ICT to all segments of people Akshaya acts as a vehicle for improved quality of life, accessibility to information, transparency in governance and overall socio-economic growth.[15]

Official website of the project is http://www.akshaya.kerala.gov.in/about

 

16.   Bhoomi Project

When the computerization of land records started by government of India in 1988-89, several states also showed some interest in the scheme. Bhoomi project also falls under the same category which was started by government of Karnataka in the year 1991 and got competed in March 2002. Supported with Central Government funding, resources from the Revenue Department of Karnataka and software designed by the Bangalore-based National Informatics Centre, the project’s data processing achievements are quite staggering. About 10,000 officials worked for 18 months for the computerization of 20 million land records which belonged to 6.7 billion land owners in 27,000 villages across Karnataka. All this was done to reduce the frauds done with the farmers due to inaccessibility of the records to them.[16] Available at https://landrecords.karnataka.gov.in/

 

17.  Dristee

It includes 5 Indian states namely Haryana, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Bihar. This project provides online buying and selling facilities to the citizens through its e commerce and agri business services. It operates 500 kiosks in different states of India and each kiosk is managed by a village entrepreneur. [17]

 

18.   Information Literacy Programme in Colleges The Hindu (e-newspaper)

This programme started in October 2006, with an aim to provide information literacy skills training to the students of the rural area colleges so that they can compete with the urban area college’s students by utilizing various information sources available in the digital environments which are generally not being utilized by them. For the above-stated purpose training is given to the students for IT tools, they are introduced to the available electronic resources as well as various online search programmes and methods to identify sources of information, like the subject gateways, Online Public Access Catalogue, etc.

 

Conclusion:

Making the relevant information available to the user community as well as making the user community well equipped with the infrastructure and the intellectual is the need of the time if we want to make progress in any field either at the individual level or at the state or the national level. So, to fulfill this demand, several initiatives, and projects has been started and supported by the government or any other organization working in this field. Despite the above-mentioned projects, there are also other projects like PURA i.e. Providing Urban Amenities in Rural Areas etc. all of which are started with an ultimate goal to diminish the digital divide and the gap between the information-rich and poor by providing equal opportunities to the users from all areas. Many of the projects proved to be the game changers while some just not worked as they are supposed to be hence got concluded, but the fact is that it is necessary to keep these kinds of projects going to help the lesser-known groups of our country to get information literate and get equally benefits from all the advancements being done in any field. Kerala got a better pace when it comes to development and implications of these kinds of projects and hence become the first state to achieve the tag of being e-literate.



[1] "Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education", American Library Association, February 9, 2015.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: b910a6c4-6c8a-0d44-7dbc-a5dcbd509e3f

[3] SSA on Education For all , available at  http://www.educationforallinindia.com/ssa.htm (Accessed on 24/06/2021)

[4] Banerjee, S. (1993). Revisiting the National Literacy Mission. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(25), 1274-1278. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4399864

[5] Mane, M. A. (2018). Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya Scheme. Aayushi International Interdisciplinary Research

Journal (AIIRJ), v(xi), 70–71. http://www.aiirjournal.com/uploads/Articles/2018/11/3499_11.Minakshi%20Arun%20Mane.pdf

 

[6] Janshala Programme available at http://suprativa.org/jp.htm , (Accessed on 24/06/2021)

[8] Rashtriya Computer Literacy Drive available at https://www.rcldgov.in/RCLD (Accessed on 27/06/2021)

[9] National Digital Library available at https://ndl.iitkgp.ac.in/ (Accessed on 24/06/2021)

[10] Subramanian, Ramesh and Arivanandan, Masilamani (2009) "Rural Development through Village Knowledge Centers in India," Communications of the IIMA: Vol. 9: Iss. 2, Article 9. Available at: http://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/ciima/vol9/iss2/9

[11] NIIT SWIFT JYOTI available at http://www.niitstudent.com/indiaa/WNGY-Revised-Swift_p.htm , (Accessed on 24/06/2021)

[12] Gorla, N. (2009). A Survey of rural e-Government projects in India: Status and benefits. Information Technology for Development, 15(1), 52–58.

https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20064

 

 

[13] ITC e-Choupal available at https://www.itcportal.com/sustainability/echoupal-ecosystem.aspx (Accessed on 24/06/2021)

[14] Official web portal of Govt. of Kerala available at https://kerala.gov.in/friends (Accessed on 01/07/2021)

[15] Pal, J., Nedevschi, S., Patra, R. K., & Brewer, E. A. (2006). A Multidisciplinary Approach to Open Access Village Telecenter Initiatives: The Case of Akshaya. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(3), 291-316. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.3.291

[16] Thomas, P. (2009). Bhoomi, Gyan Ganga, e-governance and the right to information: ICTs and development in India. Telematics and Informatics, 26(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2007.12.004

 

 

[17] Gorla, N. (2009). A Survey of rural e-Government projects in India: Status and benefits. Information Technology for Development, 15(1), 52–58.

https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20064

Monday, 14 June 2021

Information Literacy Competency Standards and Performance Indicators

Introduction:

Information literacy is the set of integrated abilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of how information is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new knowledge and participating ethically in communities of learning [1]

The above definition of information literacy is by ACRL which works as a division of the association we call ALA.

This as well as several other definitions are given by several other experts of the field define information literacy in many different ways, but the main focus is always on harvesting the needed information at the right time and utilize the same to solve the problem. [2]

But when it comes to evaluating someone in terms of his information literacy skills, some standards, or we can say that some indicators must be there which test the level of information literacy in the test individual.

To facilitate this need of evaluation The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL, 2000) an association working as a division of the American Library Association (ALA) released the ‘Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education

 

Information Literacy Standards:[3]

For the purpose of evaluation and to act as the standards and performance indicators for the information literacy programs of higher education institutions, ACRL division of ALA has formulated 5 standards, which are directly linked to the performance indicators embedded in them accordingly. [4]

The final version of these competency standards was approved in January 2000 which was prepared by the ACRL Task Force on Information Literacy Competency Standards.

ACRL has also provided information literacy standards for other fields such as for journalism students and professionals, for nursing, for anthropology and sociology students, for science and technology, for teacher education etc.[5]

Information Literacy Competency Standards and Performance Indicators for Higher Education:[6]

ACRL task force on Information Literacy Competency Standard’s final version which got approved in 2000 defined 5 Information Literacy Standards with performance indicators that are to be considered as the best practices which the higher education institutions can adopt to assess the information literacy programs.

 

These standards are:[7]

Standard One:

The Information literate student determines the nature and extent of information needed.

Performance indicators:

1.     A student possessing information literacy can identify, understand and express the information-related needs.

2.     A student possessing information literacy can recognize and find various potential information sources available in whatsoever format.

3.     A student possessing information literacy takes into consideration the costs involved in the acquisition of the desired information with a comparison to the benefits of acquiring that particular piece of information.

4.     A student possessing information literacy is capable of reevaluating the nature as well as the extent of the needed information.

 

Standard two:

The information literate student accesses needed information effectively and efficiently.

Performance indicators:

1.  A student possessing information literacy chooses the best available method for the investigation of information and also relies on the best information retrieval system for gaining the access to the information.

2.  A student possessing information literacy formulates better search strategies for the implementation purpose.

3.  A student possessing information literacy uses both the online or in-person options for the retrieval of the best information in there.

4.  A student possessing information literacy can redefine the search strategy in accordance with the need of the time.

5.  A student possessing information literacy extracts, records and manage the retrieved information along with their sources efficiently.

Standard three:

The information literate student evaluates information and its sources critically and incorporates selected information into his or her knowledge base and value system.

Performance indicators:

1.     A student possessing information literacy extracts and summarizes the main theme idea from the gathered information.

2.     A student possessing information literacy understands and implicates the initial evaluation criteria for both the information as well as the information sources.

3.     A student possessing information literacy constructs the main idea embedded in the information gathered and use it to formulate new concepts

4.     A student possessing information literacy does a comparative analysis between the knowledge gained and the prior available knowledge to determine the added values, contradictions, or any other uniqueness in the information.

5.     A student possessing information literacy checks whether the newly gained knowledge makes any impact on the acquirer’s value system and if so then takes necessary steps to reconcile the differences.

6.     A student possessing information literacy validates the understanding and interpretations of the information by making some quality discussions with other individuals, subject experts or the researchers working in the same field.

7.     A student possessing information literacy analyses the need if the initial query is to be revised or not.

Standard four:

The information literate student, individually or as a member of a group, uses information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose.

Performance indicators:

1. A student possessing information literacy uses newly acquired as well as prior knowledge to plan and create the required product or performance.

2.A student possessing information literacy makes revisions to the development process timely and in accordance with the needs.

3.A student possessing information literacy makes effective communication of the products to the audience.

 

 

Standard five:

The information literate student understands many of the economic, legal, and social issues surrounding the use of information and access and uses information ethically and legally.

Performance indicators:

1.     A student possessing information literacy is well aware of the legal, ethical, and socioeconomic issues which affect information and information technology.

2.     A student possessing information literacy works in accordance with the laws, rules, regulations, policies of the institutions involved, etiquettes and netiquettes related to the access as well as the use of the information resources.

3.     A student possessing information literacy gives proper acknowledgment to the source of the information while communicating the product or performance to its audience.[8]

 

The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) has replaced the Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (ACRL, 2000) with the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (ACRL, 2015)[9]

 

Arrangement pattern of the Standards:

These standards are arranged in a hierarchy in accordance with the Blooms’ (1956) which is used two define and differentiate between different levels of human cognition i.e. thinking, learning, and understanding. That’s why, as we move from standard 1 towards standard 5, we observe an increase in the complexity and cognition level required to achieve that standard too.[10]

These are arranged in increasing order of mental requirement or simply we can say the cognition level as the former standards focus on access to information while the later ones focus on the critical evaluation of the extracted information.[11]

 

Conclusion:

By making the analysis and review of various information literacy standards formulated by ACRL or any other organization as UNESCO, SCONUL or any other, we can conclude the following points:

§  In all the information literacy standards the arrangement follows a pattern that is indistinctively from lower order (gathering) towards the higher order (evaluation, analysis and creating new information from the prior information).

§  The arrangement pattern is somewhat similar to that of the Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956)

§  All the standards put forward by the different association follows a basic hierarchy as shown in the given figure 1.

§  These standards along with their performance indicators can prove to good evaluation criteria for the checking effectiveness of the various information literacy programs being run by any of the institution

 

 


   Figure 1 The basic hierarchy of the Information Literacy Standards

 

§  All the standards were primarily formulated by special emphasis on the explicit type of knowledge may it be gathering of the information from relevant sources or disseminating the same being bound by the IPR and other legal and ethical issues, and the tacit knowledge is somewhere left behind which preparing these drafts.[12]

§  Various information literacy standards are prepared by ACRL alone for students as well as professionals working in different fields may it be teaching, journalism, nursing, anthropology, science and technology, but what remains the same is the basic pattern and idea behind these standards. All the standards follow the same hierarchy and guide the implementer towards the same goals through the nearly same path as shown in figure 1.

§  Information literacy is getting live status in various higher educational institutes but there is need for special skills development, training the library professionals to act as instructors and instructional designers giving weight to the value of information literacy.

§  Rather than being limited to the library science field, a more multidisciplinary approach to information literacy research and instructions should be there in the curriculum.[13]

§  Offering formal information literacy programs is getting pace in various educational institutes such as University of Texas, The California State University, and The University of Washington etc.


References:

·        LISBDNETWORK. (2019, February 19). Information Literacy. Library & Information Science Network. https://www.lisbdnetwork.com/information-literacy/

·        Lau, Jesus. (2006). Guidelines on Information Literacy for Lifelong Learning.

·         "Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education", American Library Association, February 9, 2015.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: b910a6c4-6c8a-0d44-7dbc-a5dcbd509e3f

·         "Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction: A Model Statement for Academic Librarians", American Library Association, September 1, 2006.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/objectivesinformation (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: bbb3383f-1eba-dcd4-e94e-90a036e3a76d

 

·         "Standards, Guidelines, and Frameworks - Alphabetical List", American Library Association, April 16, 2018.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/alphabetical (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: c0aa687a-5bb1-428c-8425-a16a520c7913

·         Library Association, A. (2000). ACRL STANDARDS: Information Literacy Compentency Standards for Higher Education. College & Research Libraries News, 61(3), 207-215.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.61.3.207

 

·         "Information Literacy Standards for Anthropology and Sociology Students", American Library Association, February 6, 2008.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/anthro_soc_standards (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: 4abee5ef-a4ee-5c84-b1d2-9ee5a4e11b5e

 

·         "Information Literacy Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology", American Library Association, July 24, 2006.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/infolitscitech (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: b65e0fb0-5ded-a6d4-2d06-d3cb068960af

 

·         Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010

 

·         Uribe Tirado, A., & Castaño Muñoz, W. (2012). Information literacy competency standards for higher education and their correlation with the cycle of knowledge generation. LIBER Quarterly, 22(3), 213. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8167

 

·         Kasowitz-Scheer, Abby and Pasqualoni, Michael, "Information Literacy Instruction in Higher Education: Trends and Issues" (2002). Libraries' and Librarians' Publications. 34.

https://surface.syr.edu/sul/34

 

·         D’Angelo, B. J., Jamieson, S., Maid, B. M., & Walker, J. R. (2017). Information Literacy. WAC Clearinghouse.

 

 

 



[1] "Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education", American Library Association, February 9, 2015.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: b910a6c4-6c8a-0d44-7dbc-a5dcbd509e3f

[3] LISBDNETWORK. (2019, February 19). Information Literacy. Library & Information Science Network. https://www.lisbdnetwork.com/information-literacy/

 

[4] "Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction: A Model Statement for Academic Librarians", American Library Association, September 1, 2006.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/objectivesinformation (Accessed June 11, 2021)

 

Document ID: bbb3383f-1eba-dcd4-e94e-90a036e3a76d

 

[5] "Standards, Guidelines, and Frameworks - Alphabetical List", American Library Association, April 16, 2018.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/alphabetical (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: c0aa687a-5bb1-428c-8425-a16a520c7913

 

[6] Library Association, A. (2000). ACRL STANDARDS: Information Literacy Compentency Standards for Higher Education. College & Research Libraries News, 61(3), 207-215.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.61.3.207

 

[7] "Information Literacy Standards for Anthropology and Sociology Students", American Library Association, February 6, 2008.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/anthro_soc_standards (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: 4abee5ef-a4ee-5c84-b1d2-9ee5a4e11b5e

[8] "Information Literacy Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology", American Library Association, July 24, 2006.

http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/infolitscitech (Accessed June 11, 2021)

Document ID: b65e0fb0-5ded-a6d4-2d06-d3cb068960af

 

[9] D’Angelo, B. J., Jamieson, S., Maid, B. M., & Walker, J. R. (2017). Information Literacy. WAC Clearinghouse.

 

[10] Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010

 

[11] LISBDNETWORK. (2019, February 19). Information Literacy. Library & Information Science Network. https://www.lisbdnetwork.com/information-literacy/

 

[12] Uribe Tirado, A., & Castaño Muñoz, W. (2012). Information literacy competency standards for higher education and their correlation with the cycle of knowledge generation. LIBER Quarterly, 22(3), 213.

 

https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8167

[13] Kasowitz-Scheer, Abby and Pasqualoni, Michael, "Information Literacy Instruction in Higher Education: Trends and Issues" (2002). Libraries' and Librarians' Publications. 34.


https://surface.syr.edu/sul/34


For any issue related to the content or any valuable suggestion do mail us at ashishbajar@gmail.com

Thank you.